data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55b4a/55b4a9487b49e57659442d37298bbc29c6a8f8fb" alt=""
But back to the media landscape. To be honest, it’s really depressing at the moment. For an industry like omega-3s, with more than 29,000 published papers and 3,300 human clinical trials, to constantly see headlines like “No Benefit for Omega-3 Supplements…” and “Fish Oil Claims Not Supported by Research” is frustrating to say the least. These headlines are based on a very selective view of the research and ignore the fact that more than 80% of these human RCT studies have found benefits in their primary outcomes.
I know I’m preaching to the choir here; the supplement industry understands full well the challenges we face and the sensationalized headlines we battle on a daily basis. As trade associations, we need to figure out how to get ahead of these stories and how to be perceived as a credible source of information. GOED does a good job, in my biased opinion, by providing independent information from scientists in the field, or from third-party testing labs when labeling claims or contamination issues are the topic du jour. We’ve also hosted a workshop for omega-3 scientists to help educate them about best practices for a good clinical trial, but the negative headlines keep coming.
We have made some headway with the above initiatives and in a few instances, have been able to find out in advance about an upcoming article or television program. At least this way we can insert the other “side of the story” as a proactive rather than reactive comment. But it’s a brick-by-brick process that often feels like one step forward, two steps back.
The latest salvo is an upcoming documentary on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’sThe Fifth Estate program (slated for November 13) and PBS’sFrontline in the U.S.(which will supposedly air in January). We expect the story to be the same—supplements don’t work, the science is not supportive, you’re wasting your money. In this case we’ve offered to connect reporters with lipid scientists that could provide an independent interpretation of the science, but they declined presumably because it does not fit the narrative they want to tell. So this leaves us once again trying to provide our members with science-based documents that distill complex issues into simple points to help them address the inevitable follow-on questions they will receive from their customers and consumers.
Social science research indicates that for every negative story you need five or six positive stories to make an impression on a consumer, but we’ve also seen research that shows that consumers want to believe in supplements and their worth. So we keep fighting the good fight and not giving up because, really, we believe that EPA and DHA omega-3s arethatimportant to public health. While it takes effort and resources to succeed, we can make a difference in many lives if we can convince consumers of the benefits of omega-3s.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38081/380818ab845600979b713ed267e34d5292d23a71" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ca51/4ca51acfce6d54ab4b17b956fa284b66964c99b7" alt=""
Published in WholeFoods Magazine Online, 11/4/15